F.A.Q.
Frequently Asked questions
Beginning in February 2003 we start to publish some questions and answers from E-mails we received and sent. The E-mails are edited so nobody can be identified and slightly polished for better understanding. You can see whether Mark (mark (ett) worlditc.org) or Rolf (rolf (ett) worlditc.org) have given the answers. If you like to comment - please feel free to do so. Newest E-mails are on top of this list. We hope that other visitors might benefit from that.
|
|
|
| 2005 - October 20 | answered by Mark |
|
I'm fairly new to the whole idea of ITC. I have tried it before and I'm not really sure what I did or did not get. I have read much of the site but I came across one question that I can't find an answer to. |
|
|
Yes, the breathing caused a stir among ITC researchers too, some of whom assumed that when we no longer have a physical body there's no need to breathe, so they concluded such contacts were faked. |
|
|
|
|
| 2004 - October 02 | answered by Rolf |
| Hi L., Thank you so much for those important questions hence they touch the basic understanding of ITC / TC. Let me answer those questions as good as I can after 18 years of "being involved". Readers might understand that I look at this from a technical point of view. |
|
| 1. Can one actually "go back" to the precise "point of disconnect" through known techniques? | |
|
NO - in case technical means are involved like HemiSync and / or Biofeedback. More information on that in our Workgroups section. |
|
|
2. Once a connection has been previously established, what is the probability of that ever occurring again with the same subject connected with, minus the exact same conditional environment and any other identical influential factors? |
|
|
The probability is high in that very moment the experimenter uses the "right way" of getting in contact to beyond. Once a stable energetical bridge between Beyond and Here has been established it doesn‘t need that type of "preparation" on this side anymore--although it is very helpful. Example: the outstanding successful experimenter Adolf Homes meditated some times 2 hours before making contact to Beyond. Look at the article by Tiller in "Theories" "The preconditioning of...". |
|
|
3. As the original “channel” participating with me in previous scenario I would otherwise re-enlist to aid in re-creation of the previous incident is no longer available (i.e.: in contact with me, but still alive on this plane of living), should I/should I not consider that any deviation of actions to the spoken-to issue under which contact previously occurred be of any important concern? |
|
|
Hoping that I understand you right: YES |
|
|
4. Regarding specific time/location "reference point", previously unknown in relation to the meeting/connection, how might that information possibly be brought forth for use towards a greater successful effort? |
|
|
Ask your partners in Beyond because they will tell you. As time/location might be of importance for our mood f.i. it might / will influence the contacts. Look at "A model for ITC" in "Theories". |
|
|
5. Is this (converging point of time/space) where one‘s "sense" or understanding of mathematical resolution is essential, in respect to the intellectual process of "calculating", and/or even without the participation of same full "cast of characters"; and/or is this consideration even essential? (i.e.: My previous studies of various works in respect to relativity/space/time subjects I have engaged in have strongly conveyed to me understanding of the "mathematical factor" on the part of the writers, although I do not readily comprehend the same way.) |
|
|
In my opinion it is not important at all for making good contacts. Just the opposite can and mostly will take place. Feeling and understanding is most important for good contacts. |
|
|
6. Would the known information of either/both factors (math/reference point), or lack of, impact the intended sucessful outcome of this new effort in any manner/degree? (i.e.: do they really matter in the face of “resonance”?) |
|
|
YES--since factors have influence. |
|
| 7. Might "changes" in my self (atomically/intellectually) ill-serve or benefit this effort? | |
|
We have to change in order to become a partner for the enties in Beyond. They "test" us whether we are seriously interested or are gambling only. When I say that meditation helped a lot, then this will answer your question I hope. |
|
|
8. Can you/they get a visual of the other entity/you, during commencement of the regenerated interest, even if you/they are unable to see Him or her/you during this time? |
|
|
"Seing" as far as our eyes are concerned: only very very seldom. "Recognizing / perceiving" via ESP might happen more often. |
|
|
Since everything is Energy one can understand that contacts to Beyond in one or both directions demand energy. We have to supply our part and the other side will do so too if interested. It is a process of "tuning-in" from one stage of consciousness (our side) to the other stage (Beyond) and then Resonance can take place. And the stronger resonance is and the longer it lasts the better are the contacts. |
|
|
|
|
| 2004 - September 28 | answered by Mark |
|
I was wondering if there has been any instances of ITC contact with Non-Human Discarnate Entities? If yes, where would I be able to read about them? Any web links available? -- JT |
|
|
I've seen some pictures of nonhuman entities that have come through from "the other side." The INIT network of ITC researchers received a series of messages and images from a group of seven ethereal beings who have never lived in physical bodies and who have monitored humanity for tens of thousands of years. Most of those messages are included in my book, Miracles in the Storm. Please have a look also in Hildegard Schaefer's book, Bridge between the Terrestrial and Beyond. |
|
|
Is there any documentation about ITC in Cyberspace? I work with Avatar Communties in Cyberspace and I think that would be a great venue for transcommunication. I have co-produced a documentary about an Avatar Community who inhabit the "Traveler" software: www.digitalspace.com/traveler The documentary is at www.armedrabble.org/avatara --JT |
|
|
I'm not familiar with ITC in Cyberspace. The internet is so saturated with troubled thoughtforms, that it would be difficult for a positive, supportive spirit team to work with people on Earth through that public medium, I believe. On the other hand, a group of us have set up a private internet forum, and we are fostering spirit connection in that way. |
|
|
With regards to "like attracts like", are there theories that explain why we could still get pleasant spirits even though Humankind constantly has dark thoughts throughout our subconscious? -- JT |
|
|
If a group can close down to the public and remain positive (avoiding chronic fears, doubts, and animosities), then spirit can find them and attune to them. Not an easy thing for us humans to do. |
|
|
Has a portable or domestic version of Spiricom been developed yet? -- JT |
|
|
Spiricom, like most other successful ITC systems, seemed to be custom-made for and by the one experimenter who used it. In this case, Bill O'Neil. Other people built Spiricoms, but none of them worked. The hardware of these devices is not very important, while the attitudes and psyche of the experimenter are VERY important. |
|
|
|
|
| 2003 - March 08 | answered by Mark |
|
I have probably a very odd question. I was wondering if you knew the nature of "maleness" and "femaleness" in regards to the spirit world? are we only male and female here because of.."mating" purposes? or do spirits and other "beings" also have the sexes. Also some religions believe there is a reason some people are male and some people are female, have you heard of this? Do you understand what I am asking? -- JA |
|
|
Dear JA, |
|
|
|
|
| 2003 - February 21 | answered by Rolf |
|
Hello Rolf, |
|
|
Hello, |
|
|
And I don't know, what the word "omniverse" means. Can you explain it to me? |
|
|
Quote from "Roadmap of the spirit worlds": "... The totality of creation is sometimes called the omniverse. At the farthest reaches of the omniverse is the physical realm, where consciousness vibrates at its very slowest rate, becoming very dense and manifesting as forms, stuctures, and the dense, "heavy" energies of the electromagnetic spectrum. ..." As I understand this definition it includes everything: material and nonmaterial way of existence (and that includes f.e. also thinking). And existence could mean: everything that can be perceived and/or recognized by our fives senses and via ESP and in general: by consciousnesses of any kind. Do you understand how I mean that? |
|
| 2003 - February, 13 | answered by Rolf |
| Subject: ITC with computers Hey, do you have any links on how to achieve ITC with a computer? |
|
|
Hello XXX, use the computer with the sound card and the mike connected to it in the same way as you use a cassette recorder. Feel free to come back with more questions. Greetings Rolf |
|
|
Thanks, Just one more question: I have a webcam connected to my computer, can I try ITC via video using my webcam? Thanks again, XXX.
|
|
Hi XXX, |
| 2003 - February, 08 | answered by Rolf |
|
There is a point on the EVP techniques that I want some clarification on it. To write their voices on tape, the spirits have some interaction with their energetic field and the circuits of the tape recorder and NOT by means of their direct voice (because we must hear something!), true? |
|
|
yes, of course and that is called: direct voice. Please look at our website or go to "Leslie Flint". There are many experimenter that hear the voices coming from beyond through the loudspeaker of the radios used. |
|
|
Another question. There is someone that have tried to make the germanium device posted on your site, with some success? Thank you. Bye. |
|
|
yes - of course. We often say: you can get in contact with beyond using with a rusty stove pipe - or with nothing (no technical devices) as the mediums do. There are hundreds of different devices used successfully by different experimenter. |
|
|
Thank you for the info about Spiricom. I'm trying to construct the device. There is a point in the Meek's seech with spirits that make non-sense. They are discussing impedences matches in the preamplifier of the communication device, saying they would need 150 ohm 100 watt resistor. That does no make sense; you don't need a 100w resistor in a preamp; thats a thing the size of a flashlight,and runs hot. Why this? |
|
|
Please understand my hint now: "normal" technical understanding will not lead to success in ITC. If the entities in beyond recommend to use certain equipment like pendulum, IR-lamp, quartzcristall and other strange ligth sources as you can find them in the reports everywhere then because those additional materials fit into the field of energy needed to get good contacts. I strongly recommend to try to understand the principle behind ITC: it is resonance as layed down in several articles. "Normal" technical understanding would not have allowed the videos Claus Schreiber received. |
|
|
What is the Psichophone?
|
|
|
|
|
There are other groups that have reported success with Germanium Receptor?
|
|
|
Yes, but I can't mention them to you. Not because it is secret but I don't know them all. Did you visit the Scole Group website too? |
|
| 2003 - January 22 | answered by Mark |
|
Good morning Mark, |
|
|
Hi CA, |
|
| 2003 - January 19 | answered by Mark |
| Hi GA, I'll answer some of your questions below........... | |
|
I am a Psychic Medium, Spiritual Healer, and Light Trance Channel for Divine Spirit…. I would like your help in locating a few things mentioned in Mark's book so I can use them to show examples of spirit communcications in my spiritual development classes. Please let me know where I can find and hopefull buy the following: 1) Do you know where I can locate/purchase any cassettes or CDs of spirit voices recorded on phone calls and on home tape recorders (i.e. Konstantin Raudive's phone calls to George Meek and Sarah Estep in 1994) and other similar voice recordings by other people? |
|
|
My colleague Rolf Ehrhardt and I have posted a lot of voices and images on (our) this website, www.worlditc.org which are available to the public. Although they're copyrighted (we discourage inappropriate use of ITC materials), you're welcome to use them in any classes that are spiritually Light and positive, as yours seem to be, judging by your website. |
|
|
2) Do you know where I can locate/purchase VHS videos of spirit pictures on the tv (i.e. the VHS video Mark Macy played for Juliet Hollister in 1993 which had the image of deceased scientist Henri Saint Claire de Ville turning his head from left to right and talking) and other similar video/tv recordings by other people of spirit people and the spirit world? |
|
|
We've posted a few video clips on the website, but not the one of Henri Ste Claire de Ville. Again, for now I think it's best if you can use what we've already made public. |
|
|
3) Does Ernst Senkowski have any videos or other documentation of spirit communication available for sale and if so, how would I contact him? |
|
|
I suspect Ernst has a treasure of ITC results on file, but I've not been in contact with him for years, and as far as I know he's never had an email address. |
|
|
4) Does anyone have any suggestions for taking Polariod 600 photos of spirit such as type of lighting required, thoughts/intentions to send out, etc.? |
|
|
I use my Polaroid 600 in the presence of the Luminator. I have the flash unit covered with black tape, with a small, sesame-seed-size hole in the tape to allow a tiny flash of light out. The low lighting is vital for spirit faces on the film. You might try that without a Luminator, and PLEASE let me know if you have good results. |
|
|
5) Is the best tape recorder to use still the Radio Shack Panasonic RR-DR60 and do they still sell it? |
|
|
|
| 6) Is the best editing tool still Cool Edit Pro? | |
|
|
| 7) Do you have an on-going newsletter for World ITC that I can subscribe to? | |
|
|
|
8) How can I be advised of your future spirit communcations updates with Jack Stucki in future books and newsletters regarding the GT-21 Luminator and other experiments? |
|
|
I'll almost certainly report any major breakthroughs to everyone on my email list, and that includes you... |
|
|
9) What does the Luminator refered to on page 196 of your book, "Miracles in the Storm" actually do? (You refered to it by name and then you talked about using the Polaroid 600.) |
|
|
Technically I know little. The inventor told me it causes a reverse spin of electrons. Functionally, it seems to melt down the barriers between the physical and spiritual realms, allowing people in spirit to show up on film. |
|
|
Thanks so much everyone for all of your kind help. I look forward to hearing from you, to being a part of this exciting research, and to hopefully locating some helpful examples of documented contact by spirit for my classes….. |
|
|
Excellent question. There has to be lighting, but not too bright. Normal room lighting is fine usually. Not sunlight. Fluorescent lighting as in an office seems to work best as a rule. Incandescent also works. Halogen lighting I've used only once, with limited results. |
|
|
Does the person ask for their relatives or guides to please show themselves before you take the picture or do you just snap it without any particular intention by the person being photographed. (You mentioned that when psychic think Divine thoughts, the faces don't show up versus when they are thinking about everyday kind of thoughts.) Blessings, GA |
|
|
Yes, just mundane thoughts seems to work best. Unless you have a spirit team experienced with this kind of picture-taking (who can round up relatives and get them into the picture at the right time in the right way), it's best just to let spirit take its course. The subject should be open and invite positive spirit participation.Good luck! Mark |
|
| 2003 - January 12 | answered by Mark |
| Hi RO, Excellent questions, not easy to answer. But I'll try..... |
|
|
Dear Mr Macy, |
|
|
I think it was their natural ability to shape realities beyond. It's something we all do in our dreams, but they seemed to be especially gifted. (As we move to the astral worlds in our dreams, we find people and places resonant with our attitudes and thoughts, and we actually begin, or resume, living in those situations... visiting people in parks and in their homes and in small shops, etc.) That was one big factor for those experimenters (again, this is just my opinion, based on what I've learned), but a more important factor was serendipity, or synchronicity. I believe that we're going through a troubled time on Earth, and ethereal beings are moving in close, making miracles happen in an effort to help us to the next level. "The Seven" wanted to introduce ITC to the world, and specific individuals were especially well suited for the work. Everyone I've met in life, including those researchers, have certain human limitations, and it's those limitations that get it the way of our efforts to make the world a better place. For our international group, I think I can safely say that it was the strengths of many that led to our successes, and also the limitations of many that led to our failures. |
|
|
Also as a mediator I was curious about the lack of a margin for working - through differences. In other words a conflictual relationship can become better with time |
|
|
And it can also get worse, depending on whether it's our lighter side or our darker side that's guiding our interactions. |
|
|
yet the expectation seemed to be that relationships must be harmonious from the outset. Is that simply the way that transcommunication works regardless of terrestrial conflict resolution dynamics? Indeed was it the intention of some researchers to cocoon themselves from the push and shove of this process? |
|
|
Well, the ethereal beings recognized our human-ness, and they frequently encouraged us to bring our troubles out into the open and resolve them... so I think we all recognized our position (at least we do now, looking back) as an on-going process of trying to sustain harmony, as the natural human conflicts developed. The most prolific researchers tried hard to be patient and explain problem situations as best they could as they saw them developing, but some of those situations continued to worsen, and at a certain point the patience ran out. Frankly, gifted experimenters were in a very difficult situation--caught between heaven and earth, literally. |
|
|
Finally I have a question of a purely personal nature. My dad died about twelve months ago. Would it be possible to hear from him regardless of whether or not he knows of Timestream? Do they ever act like a telephone exchange? And if he was in a state similar to the one described by that guy who "slept" for 50 odd years after passing over could anyone over there tell me? |
|
|
At present, there's no fluid, reliable exchange of information through ITC systems. That will probably change in the coming years. Meanwhile, you might try some contact efforts yourself, by methods described on our website, www.worlditc.org (I'm sending a copy of this correspondence to my friend, colleague, and webmaster, Rolf Ehrhardt). |
|
| Thank you for your valuable work, RO (Australia) | |
| 2002 - November 19 | answered by Mark |
|
Dear Sir/Madam, |
|
|
Hello BE, |
|
| 2002 - July 31 | answered by Mark |
|
Hi…While i was giving a psychic reading by phone the line began going noisy like changing channel on the radio. i started hearing bells, chimes a collection of voices sounded like alien dialogue could't understand it. i kept saying who is that they kept the conversation going ( the lady i was speaking with said she has two spirits haunting her house. i mentioned to send them to God's light then they interfered with the conversation that is my guess. it was a frightening experience as my heart was pounding and was finding it hard to breathe then it went clear. i had to take a breath before speaking to lady again. any insight on this would be helpful. i had light bulbs fall out and smash on the floor but this experience is totally different. thanks for your time . A friend told me about your website. |
|
|
Hi LE, |
|
| 2002 - July 07 | answered by Mark and Rolf |
|
Hello there |
|
|
Hi SI, |
|
|
Hello SI,
As you might understand: there is no communication possible unless you know that
To that comes a problem which has to be faced: how do you know to whom you are talking?? Protect yourself as described in our articles (How to avoid unpleasant situations). |
|
| 2002 - May 05 | answered by Mark |
|
Hi Mark, |
|
|
MI, |
|
| 2002 - April 24 | answered by Mark |
|
Hey Mark, |
|
|
Hi MI, |
|
| 2002 - February 26 | answered by Mark |
|
Dear Mark, |
|
|
SU, |
|
|
Hi Mark, |
|
|
Hi SU…. |
|
| 2002 - February 17 | answered by Mark |
|
Hello, |
|
|
Dear BR, |
|
| 2002 - February 15 | answered by Mark |
|
Thank you for sending me this notice. I am curious as to how you got my email address? Also, is anyone talked to you about putting together a documentary about the process and results? Is anything going to be taped/filmed? Feel free to call me if you like. I am a Producer/Director and Writer. |
|
|
Dear JO, |
|
| 2002 - February 10 | answered by Mark |
|
Dear Mr. Macy |
|
|
Dear YO |
|
|
You are visiting our website: W |